by Maresi de Monchy

As is very well known, working as a graphologist is usually a "lonely job". The graphologist receives a handwriting, works for hours on it at his own desk, concentrating to make an in-depth analysis.

Unless the graphologist is working with colleagues, there may arise a potential danger that he or she can become "fixed" in a stereotyped way of thinking or approaching certain problems in the handwriting and finally, producing a stereotype or - in the long run - poor written report.

To avoid this problem, first of all it is of great importance that a graphologist keeps himself up-to-date with new approaches, views/points of view , expressed usually in of the various graphological associations and trying to obtain the latest books

In Holland however, there is an additional way to study handwritings. On a regular basis many graphologists gather to discuss problematic handwritings. They meet for instance monthly or twice monthly and each individual makes an analysis beforehand of the same original handwriting. Coming together they discuss and compare the outcome and often, with reference to the source, based on the specific theories.

Mere is one group that meets regularly with a Belgian group of graphologists that adheres to the French School , whilst the Dutch are formed by the German system. Bo groups make an analysis together of an original handwriting and when they meet, alternatively in Holland and Belgium , the author of the manuscript is present during the comparative session. The latter has great advantage for in-depth information.

The above way of comparing handwritings has proved to be an excellent way of obtaining not only the necessary feed-back, but also respecting each other's different approaches to looking at and evaluating a handwriting. This method has led all participating members to more insight into the different systems, more respect for the other "school" and the comfortable feeling that the final reports of the different approaches always leads to the same outcome or conclusion.

September 1998